SKIL was created by; is driven by; and is focused on persons with disabilities, their families, and communities. We provide Advocacy, Education,
and Support with Customer Controlled services to break down and remove existing barriers and bridge social gaps to ensure and preserve
Equality and Independence for all.


Effective 9/1/2017, We will no longer accept timesheets.You MUST use the Authenticare system to clock in & out.


Disability News /KLKC

SRS Signs Agreements with Four Local Governments to Keep Offices Open

Topeka, Ks - The Kansas Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services has reached agreements with four separate local units of government to keep SRS Service Centers open in their communities. Under the arrangements - cities, counties and sometimes both—agree to pay the state’s costs to keep the offices running in Lawrence, Fort Scott, McPherson and Pratt. Expenses include rent, utilities, copy machine rentals and other business costs.  

Offices in Coffeyville, Garnett, Lyndon, Marysville and Wellington, will close by September 30.  The state agency is also in the process of merging six administrative regions into four.  This plan balances population, caseloads and staffing across the regions while streamlining management at the same time.  The agency announced in early July that nine offices were slated for closure in response to a mandate set by the Kansas Legislature to cut $42 million in expenses, including $1 million in administrative costs. In addition to office reorganization, the agency has also cut other expenses across the board, such as cell phone costs and state-funded water coolers.  All of the agreements to keep the offices open are valid for two years. The agreements are void if the local governments do not provide the money, or if the legislature decides to appropriate funding for those offices at any point during that two-year time frame.  Funding agreements between state government and local government are not unusual. Until the late 1970s, when there was an SRS office in every county, local governments paid the costs of keeping the facilities in operation. The new agreements are similar also to the arrangement the state judicial system has with local governments for county courthouses.